London Home Ownership Models for Greater London Region 16:25 Wednesday, March 14, 2012 485 The LOGISTIC Procedure Model Information Data Set MYSAM.MYSAM2001 Response Variable rev_own rev dummy for home ownership Number of Response Levels 2 Model binary logit Optimization Technique Fisher's scoring Number of Observations Read 143773 Number of Observations Used 143773 Response Profile Ordered Total Value rev_own Frequency 1 0 97300 2 1 46473 Probability modeled is rev_own=0. Class Level Information Class Value Design Variables FRSEX Female 1 Male -1 HOURSPWG 1-15 1 0 0 0 0 16-30 0 1 0 0 0 31-37 0 0 1 0 0 38-48 0 0 0 1 0 49 + 0 0 0 0 1 no employment record, c. est -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 London Home Ownership Models for Greater London Region 16:25 Wednesday, March 14, 2012 486 The LOGISTIC Procedure Class Level Information Class Value Design Variables HNEARNRA 1 earner 1 0 2 + earners 0 1 No earners -1 -1 FAMTYPA Lone parent 1 0 Married /cohabiting couple - no children 0 1 Married/ cohabiting couple -children -1 -1 MIGINDA Move from outside LAD/LGD but in UK 1 0 0 0 Move from outside UK 0 1 0 0 Move within LAD area (England, Wales & Scotland) or LGD area (Northern Ireland) 0 0 1 0 No usual address one year ago 0 0 0 1 Same address -1 -1 -1 -1 FRNSSEC8 Class 1 (Higher managerial and Professional Occupations) 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Class 2 (Lower managerial and professional occupations) 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Class 3 (Intermediate occupations) 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Class 4 (Small employers and Own Account workers) 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 Class 5 (Lower supervisory and technical occupations) 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 Class 6 (Semi-routine Occupations) 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Class 7 (Routine Occupations) 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Class 8 (Never worked and long-term unemployed) -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 Frequency Distribution of Class Variables rev_own ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ Class Value 0 1 Total FRSEX Female 24348 17974 42322 Male 72952 28499 101451 HOURSPWG 1-15 4871 1717 6588 London Home Ownership Models for Greater London Region 16:25 Wednesday, March 14, 2012 487 The LOGISTIC Procedure Frequency Distribution of Class Variables rev_own ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ Class Value 0 1 Total 16-30 11321 4581 15902 31-37 15122 5646 20768 38-48 32748 12770 45518 49 + 14523 4585 19108 no employment record, c. est 18715 17174 35889 HNEARNRA 1 earner 23078 14993 38071 2 + earners 71055 22632 93687 No earners 3167 8848 12015 FAMTYPA Lone parent 7630 10536 18166 Married /cohabiting couple - no children 30016 14957 44973 Married/ cohabiting couple -children 59654 20980 80634 MIGINDA Move from outside LAD/LGD but in UK 4084 4253 8337 Move from outside UK 532 1667 2199 Move within LAD area (England, Wales & Scotland) or LGD area (Northern Ireland) 3242 3602 6844 No usual address one year ago 529 1033 1562 Same address 88913 35918 124831 FRNSSEC8 Class 1 (Higher managerial and Professional Occupations) 20427 5733 26160 Class 2 (Lower managerial and professional occupations) 30297 10435 40732 Class 3 (Intermediate occupations) 9190 4471 13661 Class 4 (Small employers and Own Account workers) 14083 3858 17941 Class 5 (Lower supervisory and technical occupations) 7817 4085 11902 Class 6 (Semi-routine Occupations) 7902 7005 14907 Class 7 (Routine Occupations) 6296 5487 11783 Class 8 (Never worked and long-term unemployed) 1288 5399 6687 London Home Ownership Models for Greater London Region 16:25 Wednesday, March 14, 2012 488 The LOGISTIC Procedure Model Convergence Status Convergence criterion (GCONV=1E-8) satisfied. Model Fit Statistics Intercept Intercept and Criterion Only Covariates AIC 180950.86 154231.52 SC 180960.74 154448.79 -2 Log L 180948.86 154187.52 R-Square 0.1698 Max-rescaled R-Square 0.2372 Testing Global Null Hypothesis: BETA=0 Test Chi-Square DF Pr > ChiSq Likelihood Ratio 26761.3366 21 <.0001 Score 26477.2868 21 <.0001 Wald 20569.9199 21 <.0001 Type 3 Analysis of Effects Wald Effect DF Chi-Square Pr > ChiSq FRSEX 1 68.3362 <.0001 HOURSPWG 5 35.3276 <.0001 HNEARNRA 2 2698.7850 <.0001 FAMTYPA 2 1251.6430 <.0001 MIGINDA 4 5773.6942 <.0001 London Home Ownership Models for Greater London Region 16:25 Wednesday, March 14, 2012 489 The LOGISTIC Procedure Type 3 Analysis of Effects Wald Effect DF Chi-Square Pr > ChiSq FRNSSEC8 7 5399.6186 <.0001 Analysis of Maximum Likelihood Estimates Standard Wald Parameter DF Estimate Error Chi-Square Pr > ChiSq Exp(Est) Intercept 1 -1.0355 0.0204 2575.6545 <.0001 0.355 FRSEX Female 1 -0.0663 0.00802 68.3362 <.0001 0.936 HOURSPWG 1-15 1 0.0232 0.0260 0.7968 0.3721 1.023 HOURSPWG 16-30 1 -0.0676 0.0174 15.1441 <.0001 0.935 HOURSPWG 31-37 1 0.0245 0.0158 2.3999 0.1213 1.025 HOURSPWG 38-48 1 -0.0377 0.0122 9.6118 0.0019 0.963 HOURSPWG 49 + 1 0.0572 0.0169 11.4773 0.0007 1.059 HNEARNRA 1 earner 1 0.0813 0.0113 51.5901 <.0001 1.085 HNEARNRA 2 + earners 1 0.6953 0.0134 2690.2955 <.0001 2.004 FAMTYPA Lone parent 1 -0.3940 0.0141 777.8782 <.0001 0.674 FAMTYPA Married /cohabiting couple - no children 1 0.0470 0.0103 20.8112 <.0001 1.048 MIGINDA Move from outside LAD/LGD but in UK 1 -0.00004 0.0247 0.0000 0.9989 1.000 MIGINDA Move from outside UK 1 -1.1323 0.0432 687.7749 <.0001 0.322 MIGINDA Move within LAD area (England, Wales & Scotland) or LGD area (Northern Ireland) 1 0.1699 0.0265 41.1200 <.0001 1.185 MIGINDA No usual address one year ago 1 -0.2627 0.0476 30.4225 <.0001 0.769 FRNSSEC8 Class 1 (Higher managerial and Professional Occupations) 1 0.7166 0.0162 1968.0400 <.0001 2.047 FRNSSEC8 Class 2 (Lower managerial and professional occupations) 1 0.4964 0.0130 1461.5245 <.0001 1.643 FRNSSEC8 Class 3 (Intermediate occupations) 1 0.2638 0.0189 194.8971 <.0001 1.302 FRNSSEC8 Class 4 (Small employers and Own Account workers) 1 0.5366 0.0183 857.8337 <.0001 1.710 FRNSSEC8 Class 5 (Lower supervisory and technical occupations) 1 -0.0713 0.0192 13.7232 0.0002 0.931 FRNSSEC8 Class 6 (Semi-routine Occupations) 1 -0.4027 0.0170 563.7842 <.0001 0.669 FRNSSEC8 Class 7 (Routine Occupations) 1 -0.5135 0.0185 766.7667 <.0001 0.598 London Home Ownership Models for Greater London Region 16:25 Wednesday, March 14, 2012 490 The LOGISTIC Procedure Odds Ratio Estimates Point Effect Estimate FRSEX Female vs Male 0.876 HOURSPWG 1-15 vs no employment record, c. est 1.023 HOURSPWG 16-30 vs no employment record, c. est 0.934 HOURSPWG 31-37 vs no employment record, c. est 1.024 HOURSPWG 38-48 vs no employment record, c. est 0.963 HOURSPWG 49 + vs no employment record, c. est 1.058 HNEARNRA 1 earner vs No earners 2.358 HNEARNRA 2 + earners vs No earners 4.358 FAMTYPA Lone parent vs Married/ cohabiting couple -children 0.477 FAMTYPA Married /cohabiting couple - no children vs Married/ cohabiting couple -children 0.741 MIGINDA Move from outside LAD/LGD but in UK vs Same address 0.294 MIGINDA Move from outside UK vs Same address 0.095 MIGINDA Move within LAD area (England, Wales & Scotland) or LGD area (Northern Ireland) vs Same address 0.348 MIGINDA No usual address one year ago vs Same address 0.226 FRNSSEC8 Class 1 (Higher managerial and Professional Occupations) vs Class 8 (Never worked and long-term unemployed) 5.712 FRNSSEC8 Class 2 (Lower managerial and professional occupations) vs Class 8 (Never worked and long-term unemployed) 4.583 FRNSSEC8 Class 3 (Intermediate occupations) vs Class 8 (Never worked and long-term unemployed) 3.632 FRNSSEC8 Class 4 (Small employers and Own Account workers) vs Class 8 (Never worked and long-term unemployed) 4.771 FRNSSEC8 Class 5 (Lower supervisory and technical occupations) vs Class 8 (Never worked and long-term unemployed) 2.598 FRNSSEC8 Class 6 (Semi-routine Occupations) vs Class 8 (Never worked and long-term unemployed) 1.865 FRNSSEC8 Class 7 (Routine Occupations) vs Class 8 (Never worked and long-term unemployed) 1.669 Odds Ratio Estimates 95% Wald Confidence Limits 0.849 0.904 0.956 1.095 0.889 0.982 0.977 1.074 0.925 1.002 1.008 1.111 London Home Ownership Models for Greater London Region 16:25 Wednesday, March 14, 2012 491 The LOGISTIC Procedure Odds Ratio Estimates 95% Wald Confidence Limits 2.230 2.494 4.100 4.631 0.456 0.498 0.720 0.762 0.280 0.308 0.085 0.105 0.330 0.367 0.202 0.253 5.281 6.177 4.252 4.939 3.352 3.935 4.403 5.169 2.395 2.818 1.725 2.016 1.541 1.808 Association of Predicted Probabilities and Observed Responses Percent Concordant 74.3 Somers' D 0.493 Percent Discordant 25.0 Gamma 0.496 Percent Tied 0.7 Tau-a 0.215 Pairs 4521822900 c 0.746 Ownership Model for Recent Movers for Greater London Region 16:25 Wednesday, March 14, 2012 492 The LOGISTIC Procedure Model Information Data Set MYSAM.MYSAM2001 Response Variable rev_own rev dummy for home ownership Number of Response Levels 2 Model binary logit Optimization Technique Fisher's scoring Number of Observations Read 18942 Number of Observations Used 18942 Response Profile Ordered Total Value rev_own Frequency 1 0 8387 2 1 10555 Probability modeled is rev_own=0. Class Level Information Class Value Design Variables FRSEX Female 1 Male -1 HOURSPWG 1-15 1 0 0 0 0 16-30 0 1 0 0 0 31-37 0 0 1 0 0 38-48 0 0 0 1 0 49 + 0 0 0 0 1 no employment record, c. est -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 Ownership Model for Recent Movers for Greater London Region 16:25 Wednesday, March 14, 2012 493 The LOGISTIC Procedure Class Level Information Class Value Design Variables HNEARNRA 1 earner 1 0 2 + earners 0 1 No earners -1 -1 FAMTYPA Lone parent 1 0 Married /cohabiting couple - no children 0 1 Married/ cohabiting couple -children -1 -1 FRNSSEC8 Class 1 (Higher managerial and Professional Occupations) 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Class 2 (Lower managerial and professional occupations) 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Class 3 (Intermediate occupations) 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Class 4 (Small employers and Own Account workers) 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 Class 5 (Lower supervisory and technical occupations) 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 Class 6 (Semi-routine Occupations) 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Class 7 (Routine Occupations) 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Class 8 (Never worked and long-term unemployed) -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 Frequency Distribution of Class Variables rev_own ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ Class Value 0 1 Total FRSEX Female 2334 3586 5920 Male 6053 6969 13022 HOURSPWG 1-15 249 254 503 16-30 657 633 1290 31-37 1224 1197 2421 38-48 3320 3689 7009 49 + 1432 1410 2842 no employment record, c. est 1505 3372 4877 Ownership Model for Recent Movers for Greater London Region 16:25 Wednesday, March 14, 2012 494 The LOGISTIC Procedure Frequency Distribution of Class Variables rev_own ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ Class Value 0 1 Total HNEARNRA 1 earner 1830 3156 4986 2 + earners 6301 5771 12072 No earners 256 1628 1884 FAMTYPA Lone parent 620 1343 1963 Married /cohabiting couple - no children 4135 5818 9953 Married/ cohabiting couple -children 3632 3394 7026 FRNSSEC8 Class 1 (Higher managerial and Professional Occupations) 2323 2370 4693 Class 2 (Lower managerial and professional occupations) 2848 3068 5916 Class 3 (Intermediate occupations) 812 1085 1897 Class 4 (Small employers and Own Account workers) 913 610 1523 Class 5 (Lower supervisory and technical occupations) 519 693 1212 Class 6 (Semi-routine Occupations) 507 1093 1600 Class 7 (Routine Occupations) 347 761 1108 Class 8 (Never worked and long-term unemployed) 118 875 993 Model Convergence Status Convergence criterion (GCONV=1E-8) satisfied. Ownership Model for Recent Movers for Greater London Region 16:25 Wednesday, March 14, 2012 495 The LOGISTIC Procedure Model Fit Statistics Intercept Intercept and Criterion Only Covariates AIC 26012.505 23933.836 SC 26020.355 24075.120 -2 Log L 26010.505 23897.836 R-Square 0.1055 Max-rescaled R-Square 0.1413 Testing Global Null Hypothesis: BETA=0 Test Chi-Square DF Pr > ChiSq Likelihood Ratio 2112.6698 17 <.0001 Score 1937.3971 17 <.0001 Wald 1662.6030 17 <.0001 Type 3 Analysis of Effects Wald Effect DF Chi-Square Pr > ChiSq FRSEX 1 3.4369 0.0638 HOURSPWG 5 13.9354 0.0160 HNEARNRA 2 597.4641 <.0001 FAMTYPA 2 473.8683 <.0001 FRNSSEC8 7 347.8348 <.0001 Ownership Model for Recent Movers for Greater London Region 16:25 Wednesday, March 14, 2012 496 The LOGISTIC Procedure Analysis of Maximum Likelihood Estimates Standard Wald Parameter DF Estimate Error Chi-Square Pr > ChiSq Exp(Est) Intercept 1 -0.8599 0.0358 577.5437 <.0001 0.423 FRSEX Female 1 -0.0348 0.0188 3.4369 0.0638 0.966 HOURSPWG 1-15 1 -0.1001 0.0799 1.5685 0.2104 0.905 HOURSPWG 16-30 1 -0.0218 0.0530 0.1694 0.6806 0.978 HOURSPWG 31-37 1 0.0615 0.0414 2.2082 0.1373 1.063 HOURSPWG 38-48 1 -0.0600 0.0307 3.8216 0.0506 0.942 HOURSPWG 49 + 1 0.0216 0.0392 0.3047 0.5810 1.022 HNEARNRA 1 earner 1 0.0425 0.0334 1.6163 0.2036 1.043 HNEARNRA 2 + earners 1 0.9314 0.0394 559.3562 <.0001 2.538 FAMTYPA Lone parent 1 0.1460 0.0422 11.9640 0.0005 1.157 FAMTYPA Married /cohabiting couple - no children 1 -0.4589 0.0277 274.5334 <.0001 0.632 FRNSSEC8 Class 1 (Higher managerial and Professional Occupations) 1 0.3585 0.0357 101.0889 <.0001 1.431 FRNSSEC8 Class 2 (Lower managerial and professional occupations) 1 0.2843 0.0331 73.9339 <.0001 1.329 FRNSSEC8 Class 3 (Intermediate occupations) 1 0.0915 0.0482 3.6019 0.0577 1.096 FRNSSEC8 Class 4 (Small employers and Own Account workers) 1 0.7014 0.0526 177.4930 <.0001 2.016 FRNSSEC8 Class 5 (Lower supervisory and technical occupations) 1 0.0386 0.0569 0.4596 0.4978 1.039 FRNSSEC8 Class 6 (Semi-routine Occupations) 1 -0.3454 0.0533 42.0537 <.0001 0.708 FRNSSEC8 Class 7 (Routine Occupations) 1 -0.4083 0.0625 42.6678 <.0001 0.665 Odds Ratio Estimates Point 95% Wald Effect Estimate Confidence Limits FRSEX Female vs Male 0.933 0.866 1.004 HOURSPWG 1-15 vs no employment record, c. est 0.820 0.668 1.006 HOURSPWG 16-30 vs no employment record, c. est 0.886 0.766 1.026 HOURSPWG 31-37 vs no employment record, c. est 0.963 0.851 1.091 HOURSPWG 38-48 vs no employment record, c. est 0.853 0.769 0.947 HOURSPWG 49 + vs no employment record, c. est 0.926 0.823 1.041 HNEARNRA 1 earner vs No earners 2.763 2.329 3.278 HNEARNRA 2 + earners vs No earners 6.721 5.585 8.087 Ownership Model for Recent Movers for Greater London Region 16:25 Wednesday, March 14, 2012 497 The LOGISTIC Procedure Odds Ratio Estimates Point 95% Wald Effect Estimate Confidence Limits FAMTYPA Lone parent vs Married/ cohabiting couple -children 0.846 0.744 0.963 FAMTYPA Married /cohabiting couple - no children vs Married/ cohabiting couple -children 0.462 0.431 0.496 FRNSSEC8 Class 1 (Higher managerial and Professional Occupations) vs Class 8 (Never worked and long-term unemployed) 2.942 2.323 3.725 FRNSSEC8 Class 2 (Lower managerial and professional occupations) vs Class 8 (Never worked and long-term unemployed) 2.732 2.163 3.449 FRNSSEC8 Class 3 (Intermediate occupations) vs Class 8 (Never worked and long-term unemployed) 2.253 1.764 2.877 FRNSSEC8 Class 4 (Small employers and Own Account workers) vs Class 8 (Never worked and long-term unemployed) 4.145 3.233 5.314 FRNSSEC8 Class 5 (Lower supervisory and technical occupations) vs Class 8 (Never worked and long-term unemployed) 2.136 1.657 2.755 FRNSSEC8 Class 6 (Semi-routine Occupations) vs Class 8 (Never worked and long-term unemployed) 1.455 1.137 1.862 FRNSSEC8 Class 7 (Routine Occupations) vs Class 8 (Never worked and long-term unemployed) 1.366 1.055 1.769 Association of Predicted Probabilities and Observed Responses Percent Concordant 67.4 Somers' D 0.363 Percent Discordant 31.1 Gamma 0.369 Percent Tied 1.5 Tau-a 0.179 Pairs 88524785 c 0.682 Mobility Model for Greater London Region 16:25 Wednesday, March 14, 2012 498 The LOGISTIC Procedure Model Information Data Set MYSAM.MYSAM2001 Response Variable rev_mov rev dummy for moved Number of Response Levels 2 Model binary logit Optimization Technique Fisher's scoring Number of Observations Read 143773 Number of Observations Used 143773 Response Profile Ordered Total Value rev_mov Frequency 1 0 18942 2 1 124831 Probability modeled is rev_mov=0. Class Level Information Class Value Design Variables FRSEX Female 1 Male -1 HOURSPWG 1-15 1 0 0 0 0 16-30 0 1 0 0 0 31-37 0 0 1 0 0 38-48 0 0 0 1 0 49 + 0 0 0 0 1 no employment record, c. est -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 Mobility Model for Greater London Region 16:25 Wednesday, March 14, 2012 499 The LOGISTIC Procedure Class Level Information Class Value Design Variables HNEARNRA 1 earner 1 0 2 + earners 0 1 No earners -1 -1 FAMTYPA Lone parent 1 0 Married /cohabiting couple - no children 0 1 Married/ cohabiting couple -children -1 -1 FRNSSEC8 Class 1 (Higher managerial and Professional Occupations) 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Class 2 (Lower managerial and professional occupations) 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Class 3 (Intermediate occupations) 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Class 4 (Small employers and Own Account workers) 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 Class 5 (Lower supervisory and technical occupations) 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 Class 6 (Semi-routine Occupations) 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Class 7 (Routine Occupations) 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Class 8 (Never worked and long-term unemployed) -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 Descriptive Statistics for Continuous Variables Standard Variable Variable rev_mov Mean Deviation Minimum Maximum Label rev_own 0 0.557227 0.496727 0 1.000000 rev dummy for home ownership 1 0.287733 0.452708 0 1.000000 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total 0.323239 0.467715 0 1.000000 Mobility Model for Greater London Region 16:25 Wednesday, March 14, 2012 500 The LOGISTIC Procedure Frequency Distribution of Class Variables rev_mov ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ Class Value 0 1 Total FRSEX Female 5920 36402 42322 Male 13022 88429 101451 HOURSPWG 1-15 503 6085 6588 16-30 1290 14612 15902 31-37 2421 18347 20768 38-48 7009 38509 45518 49 + 2842 16266 19108 no employment record, c. est 4877 31012 35889 HNEARNRA 1 earner 4986 33085 38071 2 + earners 12072 81615 93687 No earners 1884 10131 12015 FAMTYPA Lone parent 1963 16203 18166 Married /cohabiting couple - no children 9953 35020 44973 Married/ cohabiting couple -children 7026 73608 80634 FRNSSEC8 Class 1 (Higher managerial and Professional Occupations) 4693 21467 26160 Class 2 (Lower managerial and professional occupations) 5916 34816 40732 Class 3 (Intermediate occupations) 1897 11764 13661 Class 4 (Small employers and Own Account workers) 1523 16418 17941 Class 5 (Lower supervisory and technical occupations) 1212 10690 11902 Class 6 (Semi-routine Occupations) 1600 13307 14907 Class 7 (Routine Occupations) 1108 10675 11783 Class 8 (Never worked and long-term unemployed) 993 5694 6687 Model Convergence Status Convergence criterion (GCONV=1E-8) satisfied. Mobility Model for Greater London Region 16:25 Wednesday, March 14, 2012 501 The LOGISTIC Procedure Model Fit Statistics Intercept Intercept and Criterion Only Covariates AIC 112058.30 100937.09 SC 112068.17 101124.73 -2 Log L 112056.30 100899.09 R-Square 0.0747 Max-rescaled R-Square 0.1379 Testing Global Null Hypothesis: BETA=0 Test Chi-Square DF Pr > ChiSq Likelihood Ratio 11157.2056 18 <.0001 Score 11692.8585 18 <.0001 Wald 10261.2367 18 <.0001 Type 3 Analysis of Effects Wald Effect DF Chi-Square Pr > ChiSq FRSEX 1 0.1746 0.6761 HOURSPWG 5 358.9688 <.0001 HNEARNRA 2 5.1381 0.0766 FAMTYPA 2 3013.8241 <.0001 rev_own 1 5301.2720 <.0001 FRNSSEC8 7 1163.5955 <.0001 Mobility Model for Greater London Region 16:25 Wednesday, March 14, 2012 502 The LOGISTIC Procedure Analysis of Maximum Likelihood Estimates Standard Wald Parameter DF Estimate Error Chi-Square Pr > ChiSq Exp(Est) Intercept 1 -2.7226 0.0199 18807.2863 <.0001 0.066 FRSEX Female 1 -0.00428 0.0103 0.1746 0.6761 0.996 HOURSPWG 1-15 1 -0.2842 0.0406 48.9272 <.0001 0.753 HOURSPWG 16-30 1 -0.2613 0.0270 93.4793 <.0001 0.770 HOURSPWG 31-37 1 -0.0336 0.0220 2.3257 0.1273 0.967 HOURSPWG 38-48 1 0.2348 0.0163 206.5296 <.0001 1.265 HOURSPWG 49 + 1 0.1995 0.0213 87.6364 <.0001 1.221 HNEARNRA 1 earner 1 -0.0324 0.0151 4.6252 0.0315 0.968 HNEARNRA 2 + earners 1 0.00752 0.0184 0.1667 0.6830 1.008 FAMTYPA Lone parent 1 -0.3564 0.0205 302.2743 <.0001 0.700 FAMTYPA Married /cohabiting couple - no children 1 0.6383 0.0133 2302.7498 <.0001 1.893 rev_own 1 1.2671 0.0174 5301.2720 <.0001 3.551 FRNSSEC8 Class 1 (Higher managerial and Professional Occupations) 1 0.5398 0.0189 817.4083 <.0001 1.716 FRNSSEC8 Class 2 (Lower managerial and professional occupations) 1 0.2631 0.0169 243.7249 <.0001 1.301 FRNSSEC8 Class 3 (Intermediate occupations) 1 0.1843 0.0252 53.6539 <.0001 1.202 FRNSSEC8 Class 4 (Small employers and Own Account workers) 1 -0.1739 0.0264 43.2260 <.0001 0.840 FRNSSEC8 Class 5 (Lower supervisory and technical occupations) 1 -0.1860 0.0291 40.8901 <.0001 0.830 FRNSSEC8 Class 6 (Semi-routine Occupations) 1 -0.1819 0.0257 50.0192 <.0001 0.834 FRNSSEC8 Class 7 (Routine Occupations) 1 -0.3743 0.0298 157.3688 <.0001 0.688 Odds Ratio Estimates Point 95% Wald Effect Estimate Confidence Limits FRSEX Female vs Male 0.991 0.952 1.032 HOURSPWG 1-15 vs no employment record, c. est 0.651 0.587 0.723 HOURSPWG 16-30 vs no employment record, c. est 0.666 0.618 0.718 HOURSPWG 31-37 vs no employment record, c. est 0.837 0.784 0.893 HOURSPWG 38-48 vs no employment record, c. est 1.094 1.036 1.156 HOURSPWG 49 + vs no employment record, c. est 1.056 0.991 1.126 HNEARNRA 1 earner vs No earners 0.944 0.877 1.016 Mobility Model for Greater London Region 16:25 Wednesday, March 14, 2012 503 The LOGISTIC Procedure Odds Ratio Estimates Point 95% Wald Effect Estimate Confidence Limits HNEARNRA 2 + earners vs No earners 0.983 0.906 1.066 FAMTYPA Lone parent vs Married/ cohabiting couple -children 0.928 0.871 0.989 FAMTYPA Married /cohabiting couple - no children vs Married/ cohabiting couple -children 2.510 2.423 2.600 rev_own 3.551 3.432 3.674 FRNSSEC8 Class 1 (Higher managerial and Professional Occupations) vs Class 8 (Never worked and long-term unemployed) 1.842 1.677 2.023 FRNSSEC8 Class 2 (Lower managerial and professional occupations) vs Class 8 (Never worked and long-term unemployed) 1.397 1.276 1.530 FRNSSEC8 Class 3 (Intermediate occupations) vs Class 8 (Never worked and long-term unemployed) 1.291 1.170 1.425 FRNSSEC8 Class 4 (Small employers and Own Account workers) vs Class 8 (Never worked and long-term unemployed) 0.902 0.815 0.999 FRNSSEC8 Class 5 (Lower supervisory and technical occupations) vs Class 8 (Never worked and long-term unemployed) 0.892 0.803 0.990 FRNSSEC8 Class 6 (Semi-routine Occupations) vs Class 8 (Never worked and long-term unemployed) 0.895 0.812 0.987 FRNSSEC8 Class 7 (Routine Occupations) vs Class 8 (Never worked and long-term unemployed) 0.738 0.666 0.819 Association of Predicted Probabilities and Observed Responses Percent Concordant 71.1 Somers' D 0.433 Percent Discordant 27.8 Gamma 0.438 Percent Tied 1.1 Tau-a 0.099 Pairs 2364548802 c 0.717